Navigating the Path to Digital Inclusivity: Addressing the Accessibility Crisis in Federal Websites
In an era where digital presence is synonymous with public access, the recent spotlight on federal websites failing to meet accessibility standards serves as a wake-up call.
The current administration under President Biden is intensifying efforts to enhance compliance with Section 508 standards across various agencies. This initiative focuses on ensuring government information and communications technology (ICT) is fully accessible to people with disabilities.
Section 508 mandates the accessibility of all federal ICT. It underscores the government’s commitment to inclusivity and equal access for all individuals, regardless of their physical abilities.
The White House’s urging for immediate action is not just about compliance but a reflection of a fundamental shift in our understanding of digital inclusivity.
Why Accessibility in Federal Websites Matters Now More Than Ever
Imagine a world where crucial information is just a click away, but not for you. That’s the reality for millions with disabilities when federal websites don’t meet accessibility standards.
Inaccessible websites are more than just a nuisance; they represent a barrier to essential services, information, and participation in public life. Especially in this era where everyone turns to the internet for information and for services and purchases.
To top it all, for the government, which serves as a cornerstone of democracy and public service, an inaccessible website is an unacceptable oversight.
Assessing the State of Accessibility in Federal Digital Content
A recent and extensive review by the General Services Administration (GSA) has revealed concerning levels of non-compliance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act within government entities.
The report, which is a culmination of findings from self-assessments conducted by 249 federal agencies between June 1, 2022, and May 31, 2023, brings to light the urgent need for improvement in digital accessibility.
The findings are sobering: over three-quarters of the agencies assessed reported their compliance as either average or below average. This statistic is alarming, considering the critical importance of ensuring that government services are accessible to all.
It’s especially disconcerting when examining the accessibility of the most frequented digital content. The report indicates that less than 30% of the most accessed government digital content – including the top ten most visited internal and external web pages and the five most viewed video materials – fully meet the required standards set by Section 508.
This shortfall in compliance is not just a technical oversight; it has significant implications for the vast number of Americans living with disabilities.
Considering that around one in four Americans, roughly 61 million people, have a disability, the need for accessible government digital content cannot be overstated.
Moreover, the issue hits closer to home for the federal workforce itself, with about 17% of federal employees in 2022 reporting a disability. This reality underscores the urgent need for federal agencies to prioritize and address the gaps in their digital accessibility.
The GSA’s report serves as a crucial call to action. It highlights a gap between the intended purpose of Section 508 – to create an inclusive digital environment for all Americans – and the current state of digital accessibility within the federal government.
This gap poses not just a challenge but also an opportunity for federal agencies to reevaluate and reinforce their commitment to creating an equitable digital space. By doing so, they can ensure that every American, regardless of ability, has equal access to vital government information and services.
White House Directive: A Proactive Approach to Enhancing Digital Accessibility
In a pivotal memorandum issued by Shalanda Young, the Director of the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB), a strong and immediate call to action has been directed toward all agencies. The memo emphasizes the necessity for rapid advancements in the realm of digital accessibility.
This directive is not just a set of guidelines. It represents a significant commitment to integrating digital accessibility into the core missions and operations of governmental agencies.
Director Young’s communication outlines clear requirements and offers recommendations. The aim is to transform the way government technology and informational resources cater to the diverse public and federal workforce.
Director Young’s memorandum serves as a crucial step in acknowledging and addressing the digital divide that exists for individuals with disabilities. It’s a call for a proactive and comprehensive approach, ensuring that every American, regardless of their physical abilities, has equal access to digital resources.
This approach is expected to set a precedent, encouraging compliance with existing standards and striving for excellence in digital accessibility.
The memo goes beyond mere compliance. It envisions a future where digital accessibility is ingrained in the very fabric of governmental operations. It’s about fostering an environment where inclusivity in the digital space is not just an afterthought but a fundamental aspect of service delivery.
The emphasis in the memo on establishing a “positive culture” of online accessibility is particularly noteworthy. It reflects a holistic approach, recognizing that true accessibility is achieved not only through technical solutions but also through a cultural shift within agencies. This cultural shift involves changing perceptions, attitudes, and practices towards digital content and its accessibility.
Through this initiative, the White House is signaling a significant shift in how digital accessibility is viewed and implemented at the federal level. It’s an ambitious endeavor that requires collaboration, innovation, and persistent effort from all government agencies.
The goal is clear: to transform government digital services into models of accessibility and inclusivity, serving as benchmarks for organizations worldwide.
The White House’s Call to Action: A Catalyst for Change
The memorandum outlines a series of immediate and strategic actions for federal agencies, marking a significant step forward in the commitment to digital accessibility.
This directive outlines a systematic approach to ensuring that all government digital services and content are accessible to all Americans, including people with disabilities.
The memo specifies the following six key actions that agencies are required to undertake promptly:
Identification of Leadership in Accessibility: Within 30 days, agencies must report to the OMB the name of the individual who will serve as the Section 508 program manager.
This role is pivotal in overseeing the agency’s adherence to accessibility standards and spearheading the initiative toward a more inclusive digital presence.
Accessibility Statements on Websites: Within the next 90 days, agencies are tasked with establishing or reviewing their digital accessibility statements.
These statements are more than just formal declarations. They are commitments to the public, outlining how each agency plans to ensure that their websites and digital content are accessible.
Mechanisms for Public Feedback: In the same 90-day timeframe, agencies must put in place or reassess procedures that allow the public to report accessibility issues on their websites. This open line of communication is crucial for continuous improvement and responsiveness to user needs.
Comprehensive Policy Assessment: Within six months, a thorough evaluation of agency policies is required. This assessment aims to integrate ICT accessibility considerations into all relevant agency functions. It in the process ensures that digital accessibility is not an isolated effort but an integral part of all operations.
Embedding accessibility into digital project DNA: Furthermore, the memo emphasizes the importance of embedding accessibility into the DNA of digital projects. It states that, unless exempted, accessibility must be a cornerstone from the inception of any digital project and must be woven into every stage of the ICT lifecycle.
This includes initial design and development, as well as ongoing stages such as research, feature prioritization, testing, deployment, enhancements, and maintenance.
The GSA has a critical role: The OMB’s directive also assigns the General Services Administration (GSA) a critical role in this endeavor. The GSA is tasked with developing standards to guide agencies in procuring products and services that align with accessibility standards.
Additionally, the GSA is directed to develop and expand training and certification programs in digital accessibility. This move is aimed at equipping agencies with the knowledge and tools necessary to achieve and maintain compliance with accessibility standards.
These outlined actions represent a comprehensive and proactive approach to digital accessibility. It ensures federal agencies are not just reactive in addressing accessibility issues but also preemptively incorporate these considerations into their digital strategies.
The memo signifies a pivotal shift towards a more inclusive federal digital landscape, where accessibility is not an afterthought but a fundamental aspect of digital service and content delivery.
The Role of Everyone in Promoting Accessibility
The push for accessible federal websites isn’t just a task for the government. It’s a collective responsibility. Citizens, advocacy groups, and IT professionals must work together, advocating for change and offering expertise.
When it comes to accessibility, it’s not just about user experience; but also revolves around upholding the rights and dignity of individuals.
Looking Ahead: Building a More Inclusive Digital Future
The journey towards fully accessible federal websites is not just about overcoming technical hurdles. It is also about embracing a philosophy of inclusivity. Every step towards making a website more accessible is a step towards a more inclusive society.
In closing, the White House’s emphasis on improving federal websites’ accessibility is more than a directive. It is a reflection of a growing recognition of the importance of digital inclusivity.
It’s a journey of transformation, one that requires commitment, collaboration, and a deep understanding of the value of accessibility.
Contact ADA Site Compliance today for all your website accessibility needs.
Speak With An Expert Now
Have a question?
We’re always here to help.
The ADA prohibits any private businesses that provide goods or services to the public, referred to as “public accommodations,” from discriminating against those with disabilities. Federal courts have ruled that the ADA includes websites in the definition of public accommodation. As such, websites must offer auxiliary aids and services to low-vision, hearing-impaired, and physically disabled persons, in the same way a business facility must offer wheelchair ramps, braille signage, and sign language interpreters, among other forms of assistance.
All websites must be properly coded for use by electronic screen readers that read aloud to sight-impaired users the visual elements of a webpage. Additionally, all live and pre-recorded audio content must have synchronous captioning for hearing-impaired users.
Websites must accommodate hundreds of keyboard combinations, such as Ctrl + P to print, that people with disabilities depend on to navigate the Internet.
Litigation continues to increase substantially. All business and governmental entities are potential targets for lawsuits and demand letters. Recent actions by the Department of Justice targeting businesses with inaccessible websites will likely create a dramatic increase of litigation risk.
Big box retailer Target Corp. was ordered to pay $6 million – plus $3.7 million more in legal costs – to settle a landmark class action suit brought by the National Federation of the Blind. Other recent defendants in these cases have included McDonald’s, Carnival Cruise Lines, Netflix, Harvard University, Foot Locker, and the National Basketball Association (NBA). Along with these large companies, thousands of small businesses have been subject to ADA website litigation.
Defendants in ADA lawsuits typically pay plaintiff's legal fees, their own legal fees for defending the litigation, and potential additional costs. In all, the average cost can range from tens of thousands of dollars, to above six figures. There are also high intangible costs, such as added stress, time and human capital, as well as reputational damage. Furthermore, if the remediation is incomplete, copycat suits and serial filers can follow, meaning double or triple the outlay. It's vital to implement a long-term strategy for ensuring your website is accessible and legally compliant.